Methods for journalists and researchers. Moving the program of interview within the right direction

Methods for journalists and researchers. Moving the program of interview within the right direction

When it comes to duration that is optimal of interview, practice suggests that one minute of oral speech when decoding an meeting is corresponding to about 10 typewritten lines. Proceeding with this, it is necessary to assess the right period of the discussion aided by the area allocated for this in a paper or mag, essay or research paper. Then it makes no sense to talk for more than 25-30 minutes (taking into account the fact that oral translation is always reduced in volume due to clearer formulations, deletions of repetitions, etc.) if the volume of the text should be 100-150 lines (2-3 pages – the standard size of the interview),. During this time period, a journalist usually can ask three main concerns (to touch on three subjects) and 3-4 additional questions to every of them. The rule is that they should be set “in depth” rather than “in breadth”, that is, to specify the details of what has already been said, and not to ask about new facts of the same order for additional questions.

The movement when you look at the interview may take destination in four instructions:

  • forward,
  • laterally,
  • backward,
  • slide in the centre.

Moving forward and laterally when you look at the meeting

Going forward is a gradual study of one subject or even a change from subject to topic. In the 1st case, the motion is sluggish, into the second – fast. The speed that is optimal chosen for every situation, however the journalist should avoid extremes-as an extortionate deepening into the topic, whenever questions start to concern details which are uninteresting to an array of visitors, and exorbitant acceleration, as soon as the journalist, after one question about this subject, moves about the next, then to yet the following and thus, none for the topics tend to be more or less fully disclosed. Such an meeting can resemble the scene from the window of a high-speed electric train, when it comes to a specific landscape to begin with, because it straight away comes to an end.

Movement into the side takes place when the primary topic of conversation slips into an in depth discussion of any of the aspects. You also want to work on the circumstances, however in any situation, try not to lose control of time and ensure that it it is sufficient stock to ask all of the primary questions on the subject or several subjects for the interview. Go back to the primary backbone associated with discussion occurs through the opening or filtering dilemmas described above.

Movement backwards and slipping in the centre

Movement backwards happens if the journalist demands explanation and clarification of just what has already been stated. Sometimes this will make feeling, but strategically, the backward movement should be avoided, as time is wasted, while the growth of the subject does not happen.

Sliding within one host to the interview starts when the journalist calls into question the statements associated with interlocutor and begins to argue with him. Starting a dispute is quite risky. It always requires a complete lot of the time, and it will come out that the journalist just doesn’t have time for you to ask their concerns and you will be kept with nothing. In an extreme case, it is possible to get into a dispute at the end of the interview, as soon as the responses to your main questions have been received.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *